Chat GPT Detector
The Chat GPT Detector on StudyCorgi.com is a free online tool designed to estimate how likely a piece of text was written by an AI (like ChatGPT) versus a human. It analyzes patterns and word usage in submitted content and provides a visual probability breakdown to help students and educators assess whether an essay or paragraph may be AI-generated.
Introduction to the Chat GPT Detector Tool
StudyCorgi’s Chat GPT Detector is part of a suite of free writing tools on StudyCorgi.com aimed at helping students improve their writing and check authenticity. This particular tool focuses on identifying whether a given text contains characteristics typical of outputs from AI text generators.
How It Works
The detector evaluates text based on how predictable each word and phrase is according to patterns often seen in AI-generated writing. After pasting in the text (up to a character limit), the tool produces a bar chart and detailed breakdown showing which parts of the content are more likely to resemble AI versus human writing. High proportions of predictable word usage are interpreted as stronger indicators of AI generation.
Key Features
- Free to Use: The tool is available without payment or registration for students, teachers, and writers alike.
- Visual Analysis: Presents results in a chart that highlights portions of text likely generated by AI and those that appear more human-like.
- Word-Level Breakdown: Highlights individual words according to their likelihood of being AI-generated to help users understand specific risk areas.

Use Cases and Benefits
This detector is useful for:
- Students and Educators: Checking essays and assignments to estimate originality before submission.
- Writers and Bloggers: Evaluating content to ensure it appears authentically human-written when needed.
- Writing Improvement: Identifying predictable or formulaic segments that could be revised for more natural phrasing.
Limitations and Considerations
AI-text detection tools—including this one—are not foolproof. Research shows that many detectors can misclassify highly formal or non-native writing styles, and patterns may not reliably prove AI involvement in all cases. Detection results should be interpreted cautiously and not used as definitive evidence of authorship.
0 Comment